The question of why we collect stylish things has been at odds with fashion since I was born.
I spent my childhood not really understanding why, and by the time I shed my uniform, I felt like I'd accomplished a major task: I'd completely eradicated all the “Why bother dressing up?” and “People aren't just about looks, dressing up is what it's all about” attitudes in my local area. I arrived at the upper-middle age feeling quite satisfied. But lately, it seems some holdouts have survived, and I find myself eradicating them whenever I spot them.
The photo shows something I bought during yet another Temu Passion Sale.
Usually, when I find something good, I quietly secure my own share first. Only then do I tell others, saying, “If you like it, feel free to check it out.”
This time, though, I hesitated. Should I tell that person and that person that this is still available?! While fretting, I silently secured my own share and savored the sense of accomplishment.
“What you love is called ‘Chinoiserie,’”
someone once told me. So I searched, thinking Temu might have old Hong Kong items—the epitome of Chinoiserie mixed with British culture.
“It's a beautiful, elegant, and practical pin that's no longer sold.”
“That's the measuring cup that sat in the kitchen of the undiscovered cradle of mixed cultures.”
“That's the magnifying glass that's beautiful and helps you in your daily life.”
And then,
“That's the spoon that circles the rim of your cup in the steam, filling your special moments with quiet happiness.”
That month's budget was a struggle.
Better late than never, here's the Sunday edition.
![]() |
| Scarf and pin |
It would be great if wrap skirts were still popular.
Wrap skirts used to be called wrap-around skirts, and were familiar for their knee-length red fabric with thin green, white, and blue lines, a design called “tartan check”.
These wrap-around skirts used to not have buttons or hidden fabric belts at the hem (i.e., the bottom of the skirt).
That's why we have these pins.
This brass or brass-colored pin is used to fasten the hem.
This pin.
It's very nice, and of course, the pin tip doesn't come off and cause injury.
It has disappeared from everywhere in the world. Every autumn, I wonder where I can find that pin for sale.
Has it been discontinued?
I mean, I really loved those pins.
The pins used to gently fasten the edges of shawls, scarves, or berets—now called stoles—were this color too, weren't they?
Isn't that what you'd call hidden elegance? I kept thinking about it year after year. So when I found them on Temu, my eyes lit up with seriousness—you can probably understand why I thought, “If I had their private number, I'd call them right away to tell them!”
I think they still exist under the name “pin brooch,” but there used to be so many more delicate, dainty, and ladylike designs.
It's a childhood memory, but sophisticated women would wear them—slid vertically or horizontally through the beret or jacket collar—for that understated chic.
Though her face is blurred now, she was my singing teacher. I used to wonder, “Was that jewelry?” and decided I'd wear one someday. This time, my dream finally came true.
![]() |
| Beautiful Scissors |
I know many people look down on stationery like this, but I love it because it's the pinnacle of craftsmanship.
Good design is also top-tier quality. True top-tier quality only exists in things with good design. It's proof made visible, demonstrated in existence: something you can handle skillfully and that stands up to practical use.
Similarly, sewing tools also had products of this beauty. If you're interested, please take a look.
This one, amazingly, comes with a set of design arrangements for each part.
What's interesting is that the designs aren't matching pairs; each one is different.
You can wear just one armband on one hand, or you can use them as a pair with a matching design theme.
So, if you happen to be near someone sketching designs, you might gently whisper, “Hey, did you know Temu carries these too?” They might lift their magnifying glass slightly, smile with just their eyes, and say, “Thanks. I've been looking for these.” Just be careful not to mention it to anyone who loves CAD.There's a phrase used to criticize people who own stylish accessories: “They're just showing off.”
I haven't formally confirmed this, but I think the word “show off” originally meant “to dress stylishly” in a different way.
“I'm just showing off a bit” isn't humility; isn't it only used when the subject is oneself?
Why bother dressing up down to the smallest accessory when no one's even looking?
To that unpleasant question,
“I use them to show myself”
feels like the model answer.
The reason I use things I love, wear things I like, and engage in stylish quirks or playful enigmas is to feel good using them.
This is the absolute answer, the definitive solution, to that accusatory gaze asking, “Why do you bother with style?”
I plan to write about the staff soon.
Temu sells a staff decorated with a blue-eyed rabbit.
Blue-eyed rabbits don't exist in reality.
Yet it's adorned with one because it's “not prey.”
“I am not the hunted, but the hunter.”
“I am not confined to any species, I am nothing specific. I am the ultimate hunter, IT itself. I, the staff, will protect you, my master.”
That is the design's meaning.
Possessing such a reliable partner protects you, the master, from rage or agitation when faced with taunts or insults.
It becomes a staff of spirit, enabling you to calmly and smartly repel insults.
It also greatly fulfills the role of security in times of need.
Fashion, called style, is actually very practical. It guides you to repel opponents while protecting yourself socially with an intellectual attitude, and sometimes even becomes armor.
Who on earth first claimed fashion is useless, merely a superficial pursuit of looks?
If it were truly unnecessary, why has it been passed down through the ages?
Were the people who handed down the present to us really so filled with primitive foolishness?
![]() |
| A measuring spoon that blends Western and Eastern elements |
I haven't confirmed it yet, but it probably incorporates Chinese rice measurement units too, right?
For example, as of 2025, I'm mixing barley into my rice when cooking.
I add 50g of barley to my usual rice portion and increase the water by 100cc.
When measuring this 50g with this 15g measuring spoon, I add 15g three times to the rinsed rice. That makes 45g. But then I worry about the remaining 5g, which is measured using modern cc measurements.
However, with this ladle-type measuring spoon, I just need to add 1/3.
Visually divide the 15g measuring spoon into three parts, fill it to where you think is about one-third full with barley, then add it to the rice to make 50g.
I sometimes fill it halfway with barley, and it cooks just fine.
I don't think this is about “rough measurements being okay,” but rather “this is fine when measuring rice (or barley).”
It actually works just fine. It cooks without any particular problems.
I imagine the places where this was used were typically very busy.
Rather than precisely measuring with a cc cup by eye, isn't this a tool that allows sharing of seasonal temperature changes and living space-specific rules of thumb – like “this much is fine for home electric or gas rice cookers”?
When you must measure, measure accurately; when you don't need to, you don't have to. It adapts to individual variations. That's for the user to decide.
I believe this is the true essence of the now nostalgic concept of “Taipa” – “Time Performance” – the idea of not wasting time.
Sipping a small sparkling wine or glass of champagne in my room seems to cool the year-end fever.
I think I'll have one after finishing this.
Well then, have a lovely Sunday evening.
















